Ye faces $440K+ loss after federal jury rules against him for uncleared sample in Grammy-winning song "Hurricane.
- May 14, 2026
AceShowbiz - Ye recently faced a significant legal setback after a Los Angeles federal jury ruled against him in a copyright infringement case involving an uncleared sample in one of his songs.
The decision came swiftly, with eight jurors unanimously agreeing that Ye and his affiliated companies owe nearly half a million dollars in damages for using the instrumental track "MSD PT2" without authorization in an early version of his Grammy-winning song "Hurricane."
The financial penalties break down as follows: Ye himself must pay $176,153, his company Yeezy LLC is responsible for the same amount, and his retail entities Yeezy Supply and Mascotte Holdings were ordered to pay $41,625 and $44,627 respectively.
This ruling follows a lawsuit initiated by Artists Revenue Advocates, representing the four musicians who created the sampled track. The plaintiffs initially sought $30 million in damages, but the awarded amount was a fraction of that demand.
Ye's legal team quickly framed the verdict as a win, arguing it demonstrated that the lawsuit was merely an unsuccessful attempt to extort money from the artist.
The controversy centers on a July 2021 listening event held by Ye at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta, where he debuted a version of "Hurricane" that included the contested sample. The original track "MSD PT2" was created in 2018 by musicians Khalil Abdul-Rahman, Sam Barsh, Dan Seeff, and Josh Mease.
At first, the musicians were thrilled to see the sample featured publicly, sharing their excitement on social media after the event. However, the situation escalated when Ye admitted under oath that he removed the sample from the final version of "Hurricane" on his Donda album due to lack of proper clearance.
Instead of the original sample, the released track incorporated recreated instrumental elements. The musicians had spent three years attempting to receive payment before transferring their rights to Artists Revenue Advocates, who then pursued legal action.
Ye's defense contended the lawsuit was a financial scheme, alleging the musicians had initially sought permission to use their work but later filed suit when their demands were not met. His attorney also highlighted Ye's generosity in crediting the musicians as songwriters despite removing the original sample.
This case adds to a growing list of legal battles involving Ye and copyright infringement allegations. Over recent years, he has faced more than a dozen lawsuits related to unauthorized sampling, suggesting a persistent pattern of disputes in this area.
Artists Revenue Advocates indicated plans to appeal a prior dismissal of claims related to the final version of "Hurricane," signaling that the legal conflict may continue.