Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni settle their It Ends With Us legal battle, but Lively retains claims for fees and damages under California law.
- May 8, 2026
AceShowbiz - Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni have concluded a significant legal settlement related to the troubled production of the Sony film It Ends With Us. Although much about their conflict remains private, recent court documents shed light on how their contentious battle has evolved and what legal matters persist.
The settlement, filed in federal court in New York, reveals that despite the agreement, Blake Lively maintains outstanding claims concerning her pending motion for attorneys’ fees, treble damages, and punitive damages. These claims are based on California Civil Code Section 47.1, which addresses protection for survivors against weaponized defamation lawsuits.
The notice states, "The Stipulating Parties acknowledge and agree that Blake Lively does not release, and retains all claims, rights, and remedies in connection with her pending Motion for Attorneys' Fees, Treble Damages and Punitive Damages under California Civil Code Section 47.1 in the Wayfarer Action." This means the motion remains active and unresolved in court.
Furthermore, both parties have agreed to irrevocably waive any appeals against the court’s eventual ruling on this motion. The potential for treble damages poses a significant risk for Justin Baldoni, his Wayfarer Studios leadership, and their associated public relations team, as the resolution of this motion could involve millions of dollars in damages.
The legal struggle between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni, centered around the production issues of It Ends With Us, has been marked by tension and secrecy. While the latest settlement puts an end to much of the direct litigation, the outcome of the pending motion under California’s 2023 Protecting Survivors from Weaponized Defamation Lawsuits Act remains a critical factor in the ongoing dispute.
As this legal chapter continues to unfold, industry observers will be watching closely to see how the court’s decision impacts both parties moving forward.