tired, uninspired and meandering, "Wrath of Man" is a step backward for Guy Ritchie; and a misstep for anyone who invests their time and money on 118 minutes of such convoluted and forgettable nonsense
the film balances multiple storylines with intense action sequences and, despite pacing issues, packs a major punch that will keep audiences riveted; Guy Ritchie excels directing movies like this one and "Wrath of Man" doesn't disappoint
high-risk heists, double crosses, men operating at a gut level: "Wrath of Man" isn't here to play catch. In the end, there isn't a whole lot to it. But it finds its way from Point A to Point B with businesslike precision
Guy Ritchie's meathead heist movie tries to combine the hooligan fun of "Snatch" with the ice-cold steeliness of "Heat". It doesn't work; The ultimate sin of "Wrath of Man" is that it doesn't realize it's really a story about pride
Guy Ritchie reveals crucial story points with clever time-juggling editing, and keeps up the tension well into the movie's climax, which delivers exactly what the viewer will have come to hope for
Guy Ritchie and Jason Statham reunite for impressive crime thriller; Like the H character, "Wrath of Man" walks into the room confident and secure in its abilities, professional, efficient and potentially lethal
director Guy Ritchie turns the most barbaric carnage into carnival rides; "Wrath of Man" isn't as blatantly funny as "The Gentlemen" is, though it has its laughs, but it is taut and exhilarating without a single wasted moment
combining all this street-level action with an impressive roster of supporting performers, Ritchie pulls together an impressively determined thriller that sticks; "Wrath of Man" is the best, bloodiest surprise of the year so far
"Wrath of Man" matches its star's physical efficiency with a visual clarity; this is Jason Statham's show, and his stoic brutality makes this a captivating slow burn