Obsessed Reviews

Movie Reviews

• spends much time spinning its wheels and making auds practically beg for an explanation to all the madness and obsession

  by John Anderson [Variety ]

• Obsessed has little plausibility, but at moments it's an entertaining bad movie

  Review rate : C by Owen Gleiberman [Entertainment Weekly ]

• it's not Fatal Attraction: it's worse

  by Jay Stone [Canada.com ]

• has a low-voltage, cable-TV-movie feel

  by Chris Hewitt [St. Paul Pioneer Press ]

• an ordinary, cheap seduction thriller if it weren't for its extraordinary mix of stars

  Review rate : B by Natasha Vargas-Cooper [E! Online ]

• a clanking, low-rent imitation of "Fatal Attraction" that lacks the imagination to come up with such a novelty

  by Stephen Holden [NY Times ]

• "Obsessed" is minor league ball compared to the other wonderfully lurid highlights of the subgenre

  Review rate : D- by Brian Orndorf [BrianOrndorf.com ]
• Reviewed by Nick Schager [Slant Magazine ]
• Reviewed by Roger Moore [Orlando Sentinel ]
• Reviewed by Tracie Cooper [TV Guide ]
• Reviewed by Joe Neumaier [NY Daily News ]
• Reviewed by Kirk Honeycutt [Hollywood Reporter ]
• Reviewed by Peter Travers [Rolling Stone ]

Reader's Reviews

How many stars? 1 [Very Bad] 2 3 4 5 [Excellent]

   

Comment *