- CELEBRITY
- 11:00 PM, Mar 28
this lazy, shapeless, humor-free pictureby Rene Rodriguez [Miami Herald ]
there's no point whatsoever to "Little Fockers,"by Moira Macdonald [Seattle Times ]
the whole set-up just isn't very funnyby Roger Moore [Orlando Sentinel ]
the uneven humorby Claudia Puig [USA Today ]
the million-dollar cast doesn't make the vulgar penny-ante jokes any funnierby Carrie Rickey [Philadelphia Inquirer ]
the humor goes below the belt early and oftenby Ty Burr [Boston Globe ]
the film will probably be a big favorite in retirement homes and with mainstream audiences of a certain ageby Todd McCarthy [Hollywood Reporter ]
relatable mix of cringe-humor and slapstickReview rate : D by Scott Tobias [AV Club ]
provides some lovely values for the holiday seasonby Sara Maria Vizcarrondo [Boxoffice Magazine ]
packs in all the cynicism and laziness of a tired franchise's third chapterby Chris Vognar [Dallas Morning News ]
offers terrific actors serving weak materialby Jason Heck [Kansas City Star ]
more than a little disappointingby Joe Williams [St. Louis Post-Dispatch ]
it feels like the chintzy reunion episode of a sitcomby Jesse Hassenger [Filmcritic.com ]
give us all a few vulgar holiday laughsReview rate : C by Gary Thompson [Philadelphia Daily News ]
barely features childrenby Nick Schager [Slant Magazine ]
a semi-painful, semi-amusing sequelby Amy Biancolli [Houston Chronicle ]