The Dukes of Hazzard Reviews

Movie Reviews

• wasting your time

  by Gene Seymour [Newsday ]

• the worst movie I've ever seen

  by Andrea Chase [Killer Movie Reviews ]

• surprisingly enjoyable

  by Daniel Neman [Richmond Times-Dispatch ]

• surely must rank among the worst

  by Tim Knight [Reel ]

• sort of fun in a slumming kind of way

  by Jeff Vice [Deseret News, Salt Lake City ]

• soon be little more than a memory

  by Bill Muller [The Arizona Republic ]

• one dumb movie

  by Kit Bowen [Hollywood ]

• not very funny at all

  by [E! Online ]

• not a total loss

  by David Levine [Filmcritic ]

• loud, juvenile, and eminently low-brow

  by Pete Vonder Haar [Film Threat, Hollywood's Indie Voice ]

• it's not particularly funny

  by Joshua Starnes [Comingsoon ]

• it doesn?t rate much higher

  by Paul Malcolm [L.A. Weekly ]

• isn?t really worth paying too much for

  by Zak Santucci [The Cinema Source ]

• isn?t perfect

  by Peter Sobczynski [EFilmCritic ]

• hilarious in the dumbest possible way

  by Jeff Farance [The Daytona Beach News-Journal ]

• best enjoyed with your eyes closed

  by James Verniere [Boston Herald ]

• a pale imitation of the original

  by Michael Rechtshaffen [The Hollywood Reporter ]

• a crass and silly fender bender

  by Robert Denerstein [Denver Rocky Mountain News ]

• 100 minutes of anticlimax

  by Wesley Morris [Boston Globe ]
• Reviewed by Owen Gleiberman [Entertainment Weekly ]
• Reviewed by Chris Vognar [The Dallas Morning News ]
• Reviewed by Ed Gonzalez [Slant Magazine ]
• Reviewed by Barbara Vancheri [Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ]
• Reviewed by Joe Williams [St. Louis Post-Dispatch ]
• Reviewed by Ed Blank [Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ]
• Reviewed by Eyder Peralta [Houston Chronicle ]
• Reviewed by Marrit Ingman [Austin Chronicle ]
• Reviewed by John Urbanich [Sun Newspapers of Cleveland ]
• Reviewed by Terry Lawson [Detroit Free Press ]
• Reviewed by Mack Bates [The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel ]
• Reviewed by Allison Benedikt [Chicago Tribune ]

Reader's Reviews

How many stars? 1 [Very Bad] 2 3 4 5 [Excellent]

   

Comment *